1. This site uses cookies. By continuing to use this site, you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Learn More.

UK population rise of 538,000 is biggest for 70 years

Discussion in 'Headline News' started by Ome, Jun 22, 2017.

  1. Ome

    Ome Admin

    Threads:
    629
    Messages:
    10,849
    Trophy Points:
    3,638
    Ratings:
    +19,941
    The population of the UK has increased by more than half a million - the biggest rise for 70 years - according to official figures.

    There were 65,648,000 people in the UK in June 2016, according to the Office for National Statistics (ONS).

    The ONS said that was a rise of 538,000 on the figure in 2015, equivalent to a city the size of Bradford.

    Net migration of 336,000 accounted for 62.4%, while the difference between birth and death rates made up 35.8%.

    There was also an increase of 9,500 in armed forces personnel based in the UK.

    Baby boom
    The population went up in 364 local authority areas, with the biggest rises in the City of London (7.3%) and Tower Hamlets (3.3%).

    It fell in 26 areas, including South Lakeland and Aberdeen, 17 of them on the coast, and remained the same in one.

    Last year's increase was the highest since 1947, which saw a rise of 551,000, driven mainly by a surge in births after World War Two.

    Around the UK, the population of England jumped by 481,800 (0.9%) to 55,268,100 - and is now more than 55 million for the first time.

    The population of Scotland increased by 31,700 (0.6%) to 5,404,700, Wales by 14,100 (0.5%) to 3,113,200, and Northern Ireland by 10,500 (0.6%) to 1,862,100.

    'Main driver'
    Neil Park, head of the Population Estimates Unit at the ONS, said: "The population of the UK continued to grow in the year to mid-2016 at a similar rate to that seen over recent years.

    "Net international migration continued to be the main driver, but there was also an increase in births and fewer deaths than last year."

    The population of the UK has increased by just over five million in 11 years - previously it took 35 years, from 1970 to 2005, to make the same leap.

    Population change in the UK has averaged 482,000 a year over the past decade.

    The ONS bases its figures on the usually resident population of the UK, and long-term international migrants who change their country of usual residence for a period of 12 months or more.
     
    • Like Like x 1
  2. Angela Channing

    Angela Channing World Cup of Soaps Moderator EXP: 21 Years

    Threads:
    196
    Messages:
    8,019
    Trophy Points:
    7,960
    Ratings:
    +12,377
    Medals:
    13
    Member Since:
    1999
    AS people are living longer, there needs to be more younger people in the population to support them. Immigration and a higher birth rate are essential if we don't want our standard of living to fall significantly. Currently, the baby boom generation born in the 1960s and 1970s are at the point in their careers when they are at their peak earnings so there currently isn't a problem in having sufficient tax revenues pay for pensions, health and social care for the elderly, as well as paying for public services. However, in 20 years when many of this generation will have retired, massively swelling the number or elderly people in the population, we will be grateful for the rise in immigration and birth rate in recent years otherwise the baby boomers will have to continue working well into their 70s Because the economy wouldn't be able to support them.
     
    • Like Like x 3
  3. Emelee

    Emelee Soap Chat Winner EXP: 7 Years

    Threads:
    364
    Messages:
    3,562
    Trophy Points:
    2,551
    Occupation:
    Procrastinatress
    Location:
    Sweden
    Ratings:
    +5,762
    Medals:
    9
    It's a very good thing. As @Angela Channing said, the longer humans live and are senior citizens, the more younger people are needed to pay for them. It's a kind of vicious cycle when you think about it. We are in constant need for the population to grow to pay for everything in society --- but Earth is already over populated. Catch 22. Cause we can't go ahead and kill people when they reach the age of 85... or can we? :lol:
     
    • Like Like x 1

Share This Page