Join Today
Online now: 21185 fans currently online (312 members and 20873 guests)
+ Reply to Thread
Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 20 of 36
  1. #1
    Starting Out
    Join Date
    May 2011
    Posts
    4
    vCash
    500
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked 11 Times in 3 Posts
    groans
    0
    groaned 1 Time in 1 Post
    Karma
    0

    Default what's inherently wrong with the new series...

    four episodes in and it's becoming clear a whole generation of Ewing history is being completely disregarded... for all the sparse references to the original series, there's absolutely no reference to any second generation (and very core) characters, from Jenna Wade onwards... as a knock-on effect, a whole raft of kids are completely ignored... Lucas, James, JR's grandkid, JR's other kid with Cally... these should all be able to provide story fodder way beyond what's currently being executed...

    and way too many familiar background elements are missing; the Oil Barons Club (and the Ball !) any mention of Weststar (and Ewing Oil for that matter!)... there's just too many omissions all the more noticable for their very omission.

  2. The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to iang74 For This Useful Post:

    Lovely Linda (06-28-2012),quiche (06-28-2012)

  3. #2
    SoapChat Costume designer
    Join Date
    Nov 2011
    Posts
    857
    vCash
    510
    Thanks
    78
    Thanked 266 Times in 141 Posts
    groans
    1
    groaned 55 Times in 44 Posts
    Karma
    8618312

    Default

    I think they need more time to accomplish that. They're only four episodes in with 6 to go for this season. I'm particularly interested in seeing what the current oil business situation is in Dallas now, such as who would be the biggest competitors to the Ewings? What has become of West Star? Is there a new cartel? Why has the name Ewing Oil not even been mentioned? Next season hopefully we'll see the introduction of more of those people you're talking about - Cally's child and Lucas especially. Somehow I don't expect James or his son to be part of this new Dallas, mainly because I don't think they want to remind us of how bad Dallas got by the time James was part of the show. So I don't expect to see Cally either, but I hope that her son or daughter shows up.

  4. #3
    Soapy Art Director Sid Fairgate's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 1999
    Location
    Yakima, Washington
    Posts
    8,948
    vCash
    400
    Thanks
    1,188
    Thanked 2,004 Times in 712 Posts
    My Mood
    Cynical
    groans
    216
    groaned 75 Times in 73 Posts
    Karma
    21474858

    Default

    Precisely right. I brought these issues up before the show even aired, and was told in a condescending fashion that the new series would be like a cheap piece of fan fiction if original fans had their way. To quote Christopher, I find that to be "bullshit" myself. Personally, I think this show needs more familiar events, places, and referrences to the past. If they don't tap into that history, what's the point of doing a continuation? Instead, Cidre seems more interested in creating her own history by expecting us to believe that Carmen and Elena have been around Christopher since he was 5.

    I also thought the barbeque was a wasted opportunity. It was completely uneventful, which can't be said about the previous barbeques.
    "We believe that 'we're all in this together' is a far better philosophy than 'you're on your own.'" - Bill Clinton

  5. The Following 7 Users Say Thank You to Sid Fairgate For This Useful Post:

    A House Divided (06-28-2012),Barbara Fan (06-28-2012),dronica (06-28-2012),Lovely Linda (06-28-2012),PAMANDBOBBYFOREVER (06-29-2012),quiche (06-30-2012),Tessie (06-28-2012)

  6. #4
    SoapChat Boom operator
    Join Date
    Mar 2012
    Posts
    345
    vCash
    0
    Thanks
    154
    Thanked 190 Times in 108 Posts
    groans
    0
    groaned 3 Times in 2 Posts
    Karma
    2142635

    Default

    I agree with Kenny on this point about needing time. If you use original Dallas as a template, Gary and Val were mentioned once or twice in the miniseries, but didn't actually appear until season 2. Ewing cousins Jack and Jamie didn't even get mentioned until season 6. And if a big argument is the show isn't developing its young characters in the ten episodes they have, how much worse would it be if you stuck three of four more main cast members in and have to develop them? That would take time away from the veterans, which is the reason why many people are primarily tuned into the show.

    In hindsight, I wish they had made the pilot into more of a reunion movie, with some event like Miss Ellie's funeral so the whole family (Classic cast and next generation) could come together, be introduced, and people could at least get introduced to the next generation. Then if characters like Lucas and Margaret had to be shelved for the first season for story purposes, they could come back as needed later on (that's how Jenna went from appearing in one episode, to being off a year, to being back for an episode, then off a year, and finally becoming part of the cast. Kristin, too, had a quick appearance in a couple episodes before coming back as a major character).

  7. The Following User Says Thank You to Beware of Bobby's shower For This Useful Post:

    Coffeecup (07-06-2012)

  8. #5
    SoapChat Set Designer
    Join Date
    Feb 2005
    Location
    USA
    Posts
    1,990
    vCash
    550
    Thanks
    137
    Thanked 183 Times in 103 Posts
    groans
    4
    groaned 31 Times in 18 Posts
    Karma
    21474846

    Default

    I agree references to later characters would be nice, it would indicate writers who had truly done their homework. Ann is intimidated by Pam we hear, but how about the memory of April as well? There would be ways to work it in, educate the new audience, and respect the old one.

  9. #6
    Soapy Art Director Sid Fairgate's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 1999
    Location
    Yakima, Washington
    Posts
    8,948
    vCash
    400
    Thanks
    1,188
    Thanked 2,004 Times in 712 Posts
    My Mood
    Cynical
    groans
    216
    groaned 75 Times in 73 Posts
    Karma
    21474858

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Cliff Barnes View Post
    I agree references to later characters would be nice, it would indicate writers who had truly done their homework. Ann is intimidated by Pam we hear, but how about the memory of April as well? There would be ways to work it in, educate the new audience, and respect the old one.
    I was never a big fan of Bobby and April as a couple, but it is interesting that there's been no mention of her. Elena even refers to Pam as "the only mom Christopher ever knew." However, he had grown close to April before she died. I'm kind of surprised that Bobby and Christopher haven't reflected on her yet.
    "We believe that 'we're all in this together' is a far better philosophy than 'you're on your own.'" - Bill Clinton

  10. #7
    SoapChat Costume designer
    Join Date
    Jul 2011
    Posts
    842
    vCash
    400
    Thanks
    3
    Thanked 248 Times in 165 Posts
    groans
    4
    groaned 3 Times in 3 Posts
    Karma
    6791684

    Default

    I thought while they were packing up southfork they come across a wedding photo of Bobby and April. Just to show he was married to someone after Pam.

  11. #8
    SoapChat Costume designer BJ Ewing's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2010
    Posts
    683
    vCash
    17850
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked 151 Times in 88 Posts
    groans
    0
    groaned 3 Times in 3 Posts
    Karma
    15845958

    Default

    Keep in mind the Ewings are out of the oil business and have been for nearly a generation (over 20 years) since the movies are being discounted. That might clue us in about why they aren't connected to major players in today's industry...yet.

  12. #9
    SoapChat Camera Operator
    Join Date
    Dec 2011
    Location
    USA
    Posts
    3,625
    vCash
    410
    Thanks
    865
    Thanked 1,156 Times in 693 Posts
    groans
    19
    groaned 65 Times in 55 Posts
    Karma
    18617658

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by iang74 View Post
    four episodes in and it's becoming clear a whole generation of Ewing history is being completely disregarded... for all the sparse references to the original series, there's absolutely no reference to any second generation (and very core) characters, from Jenna Wade onwards... as a knock-on effect, a whole raft of kids are completely ignored... Lucas, James, JR's grandkid, JR's other kid with Cally... these should all be able to provide story fodder way beyond what's currently being executed...

    and way too many familiar background elements are missing; the Oil Barons Club (and the Ball !) any mention of Weststar (and Ewing Oil for that matter!)... there's just too many omissions all the more noticable for their very omission.
    I can not believe how screentime is wasted on dragged out stories and so many plots and twists. The whole problem rests in how the new Dallas is being written.

  13. The Following User Says Thank You to quiche For This Useful Post:

    Karin Schill (06-30-2012)

  14. #10
    Soapy Director ronald mascot's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2011
    Posts
    5,359
    vCash
    2500
    Thanks
    1,121
    Thanked 3,405 Times in 1,767 Posts
    My Mood
    Grumpy
    groans
    48
    groaned 102 Times in 83 Posts
    Karma
    21474844

    Default

    I think it's okay to limit old references- new people who watch the show won't know who they are and could end up wondering if they are missing some sort of big plot point by not knowing the names that are going by- so it could confuse and annoy them. They are already having to hear a lot about people who are no longer there- such as Pam, Miss Ellie and Jock.

  15. #11
    SoapChat Set Designer JR_fan's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2004
    Location
    Toronto Canada
    Posts
    1,632
    vCash
    500
    Thanks
    110
    Thanked 187 Times in 111 Posts
    groans
    4
    groaned 3 Times in 3 Posts
    Karma
    4592164

    Default

    We're only 4 episodes into the show. I think we need a bit more time before we can delve into all those other characters and loose ends. I think that's perhaps what the person who was talking to Sid Fairgate meant by the "cheap fan fiction" comment. I think said person could've worded it better but there's a point to it. You can't just throw everything at the viewers and expect them to be able to swallow it all. We have to remember that the audience that this show is trying to capture apart from us are people who only know DALLAS for the Dream Season, Who Shot JR? and half of these people confuse this show with Dynasty! (vomit)

    So it's going to take a little more time and if this show can switch some of the pacing a bit to allow for more character driven moments then I think we'll start to see some of the familiar 2nd generation folks or at least hear about them.

  16. The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to JR_fan For This Useful Post:

    Beware of Bobby's shower (06-28-2012),Pam's Twin Sister (06-28-2012),Sarah (06-28-2012)

  17. #12
    Daytime TV Star
    Join Date
    Mar 2003
    Posts
    14,467
    vCash
    500
    Thanks
    4,356
    Thanked 1,312 Times in 669 Posts
    groans
    106
    groaned 34 Times in 31 Posts
    Karma
    21474861

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Sid Fairgate View Post
    Precisely right. I brought these issues up before the show even aired, and was told in a condescending fashion that the new series would be like a cheap piece of fan fiction if original fans had their way. To quote Christopher, I find that to be "bullshit" myself. Personally, I think this show needs more familiar events, places, and referrences to the past. If they don't tap into that history, what's the point of doing a continuation? Instead, Cidre seems more interested in creating her own history by expecting us to believe that Carmen and Elena have been around Christopher since he was 5.

    I also thought the barbeque was a wasted opportunity. It was completely uneventful, which can't be said about the previous barbeques.
    Agree. It's hilarious to read the not-so-wonderful reviews which state the same concerns/questions that were mentioned prior to the show airing.
    20 years later and things have not changed: Sue Ellen is still the same idiot she always was. - JROG

    The rule of the dimwitted is unparalleled because there are so many of them and their votes count just as much as ours. – Albert Einstein

    The Bible and the Constitution are two entirely separate documents and our country is only governed by one of them. - Sunnyhorse, CPMCoG

    Anti-Forkie.

  18. The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Tessie For This Useful Post:

    PAMANDBOBBYFOREVER (06-29-2012),Sid Fairgate (07-06-2012)

  19. #13
    SoapChat Set Designer JRandSueEllenForever's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2012
    Posts
    2,358
    vCash
    500
    Thanks
    472
    Thanked 1,884 Times in 932 Posts
    groans
    2
    groaned 13 Times in 13 Posts
    Karma
    8672037

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Sid Fairgate View Post
    I was never a big fan of Bobby and April as a couple, but it is interesting that there's been no mention of her. Elena even refers to Pam as "the only mom Christopher ever knew." However, he had grown close to April before she died. I'm kind of surprised that Bobby and Christopher haven't reflected on her yet.
    Nobody's been reflecting on anybody yet. The closest Bobby came to reflecting on Pam was saying that Ann felt "threatened" by her memory. Ray and Lucy appear and reappear as ghosts on Southfork, uttering little more than one line each, every other episode. What is the point of them being around if there isn't going to be a plot that involves them? It's frustrating that the writers aren't reconciling the old with the new. Us old timers would love to know what Ray and Lucy have been up to lately. How about Jenna and Lucas? Gary and Val? Afton?

    Ewing Oil has only been mentioned once as far as I know, while John Ross was ranting about how his mother screwed up his life by sending him off to boarding school, and now Cliff Barnes is running the company. Not one scene of Cliff at Ewing Oil offices though.
    Yes, JR. The answer is yes. You were the love of my life!

  20. The Following User Says Thank You to JRandSueEllenForever For This Useful Post:

    PAMANDBOBBYFOREVER (06-29-2012)

  21. #14
    Chat Show Host
    Join Date
    Sep 2000
    Location
    UK
    Posts
    19,886
    vCash
    500
    Thanks
    433
    Thanked 680 Times in 364 Posts
    groans
    17
    groaned 15 Times in 14 Posts
    Karma
    21474868

    Default

    I'm just loving it.
    "Anyone who reacts critically to a show in a written-down form, whether it's professionally or in a blog, is responding to the programme in a perfectly valid way, but in an utterly atypical way. That's just not how people watch television." - Steven Moffat

  22. #15
    Dynasty Forum Moderator SnarkyOracle!'s Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2001
    Location
    That cottage in the shadow of Scorpio Peak
    Posts
    32,820
    vCash
    500
    Thanks
    1,275
    Thanked 3,439 Times in 1,704 Posts
    groans
    359
    groaned 284 Times in 263 Posts
    Karma
    21474881

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by JR_fan View Post
    We're only 4 episodes into the show. I think we need a bit more time before we can delve into all those other characters and loose ends.
    Agreed.
    Quote Originally Posted by JR_fan
    You can't just throw everything at the viewers and expect them to be able to swallow it all. We have to remember that the audience that this show is trying to capture apart from us are people who only know DALLAS for the Dream Season, Who Shot JR? and half of these people confuse this show with Dynasty! (vomit)
    Well, DYNASTY's Seasons 1, 2 and 9 were good. The rest of it was, indeed, vomit.

  23. #16
    Soapy Director ronald mascot's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2011
    Posts
    5,359
    vCash
    2500
    Thanks
    1,121
    Thanked 3,405 Times in 1,767 Posts
    My Mood
    Grumpy
    groans
    48
    groaned 102 Times in 83 Posts
    Karma
    21474844

    Default

    I think some of this is a lose/lose situation. If Ray and Lucy were not in it at all, I'm sure there would be stuff like "They could at least show Lucy or Ray at the BBQ or wedding even if they didn't say anything."

  24. #17
    SoapChat Boom operator
    Join Date
    Aug 2009
    Location
    Thousand Oaks in the 90's
    Posts
    379
    vCash
    500
    Thanks
    20
    Thanked 15 Times in 7 Posts
    groans
    0
    groaned 0 Times in 0 Posts
    Karma
    11996842

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by ronald mascot View Post
    I think some of this is a lose/lose situation. If Ray and Lucy were not in it at all, I'm sure there would be stuff like "They could at least show Lucy or Ray at the BBQ or wedding even if they didn't say anything."
    True and as JR_Fan says, let's give it more time. So far, I like what I've seen.

  25. #18
    SoapChat Set Designer Lovely Linda's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2011
    Location
    Germany
    Posts
    1,438
    vCash
    500
    Thanks
    973
    Thanked 640 Times in 411 Posts
    My Mood
    Chatty
    groans
    19
    groaned 23 Times in 19 Posts
    Karma
    10260116

    Default

    I agree that they probably shouldn't reference too much because that would be annoying for new viewers of the show.
    But they should definitely take better care of defining the characters. You need to know where people stand and what they stand for. Characters may change during the course of a show but I feel that this show is completely lacking a good layout of characters- as well as a clear outline of the relationship between the characters.
    They think by keeping it all unclear they might make the storyline more exciting but for me this isn't working at all. It is like we keep orbiting around something and never get to the point...

  26. The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to Lovely Linda For This Useful Post:

    Karin Schill (06-30-2012),Miss Lush (06-28-2012),Tessie (06-29-2012)

  27. #19
    Chat Show Host
    Join Date
    Sep 2000
    Location
    UK
    Posts
    19,886
    vCash
    500
    Thanks
    433
    Thanked 680 Times in 364 Posts
    groans
    17
    groaned 15 Times in 14 Posts
    Karma
    21474868

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Lovely Linda View Post
    You need to know where people stand and what they stand for.
    Not necessarily. I like a bit of ambiguity. I'm happy just to enjoy the ride.
    "Anyone who reacts critically to a show in a written-down form, whether it's professionally or in a blog, is responding to the programme in a perfectly valid way, but in an utterly atypical way. That's just not how people watch television." - Steven Moffat

  28. #20
    SoapChat Set Designer Miss Lush's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2009
    Location
    Melbourne, AUS
    Posts
    1,656
    vCash
    500
    Thanks
    275
    Thanked 705 Times in 356 Posts
    groans
    20
    groaned 27 Times in 25 Posts
    Karma
    21474841

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Lovely Linda View Post
    I agree that they probably shouldn't reference too much because that would be annoying for new viewers of the show.
    But they should definitely take better care of defining the characters. You need to know where people stand and what they stand for. Characters may change during the course of a show but I feel that this show is completely lacking a good layout of characters- as well as a clear outline of the relationship between the characters.
    They think by keeping it all unclear they might make the storyline more exciting but for me this isn't working at all. It is like we keep orbiting around something and never get to the point...
    Exactly! Orbiting...and orbiting...and orbiting.

  29. The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Miss Lush For This Useful Post:

    Lovely Linda (06-29-2012),Tessie (06-29-2012)


 

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may post new threads
  • You may post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •